PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, PERTUMBUHAN PERUSAHAAN, DAN OPINI AUDIT TAHUN SEBELUMNYA TERHADAP PENERIMAAN OPINI GOING CONCERN

Authors

  • Salsabila Katarin Puspamarta Universitas Pamulang
  • Siti Mundiroh Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jaemb.v3i1.1030

Keywords:

Going Concern Audit Opinion, Institusional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Company’s Growth, Opinion Prior Year.

Abstract

This study aims to prove empirically the effect of ownership structure, company’s growth, and opinion prior year on the acceptance of going concern opinion. This research was conducted on basic materials sector listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2017-2021 period. Data used is logistic regression. The sample selection was carried out using the purposive sampling method from secondary data in the form a financial statements and found as many as 16 sample companies with a total of 5 years of observations, so the total sample in this study was 80 observational data. Based on the test results, it was found that ownership structure, company’s growth, and opinion prior year have a simultaneous effect of opinion year on acceptance of going concern opinion. Partially, this study proves the influence of opinion prior year on acceptance of going concern opinion. Meanwhile, institusional ownership, managerial ownership, and company’s growth partially have no effect on the acceptance of going concern opinion.

 

References

R, Akbar and Ridwan, “Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Ukuran Perusahaan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan dan Reputasi KAP Terhadap penerimaan Opini Going Concern”, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp 283-303, 2019.

B. N. Andini, Soebandi, and Y. Peristiwaningsih, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vo. 19, no. 2, pp 380-394, 2021, doi: 10.29062/mahardika.v19i2.262.

L. Olavia, “12 Emiten IHSG Berpotensi Delisting”, internet: www.beritasatu.com/amp/ekonomi/853705/, Des 14, 2021 [Okt 27, 2022]

M. Ekawati and F. A. Sumantri, “Analisa Pengaruh Nilai Perusahaan, Dewan Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 1, no. 3, pp 1-12, 2022.

I. Ghozali and D. Ratmono, Analisis Multivariat dan Ekonometrika Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Dengan Eviews 10, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2020, pp 31-294.

Gudono, Analisis Data Multivariat, Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UGM, 2020, pp 151-178.

M. F. Hamid and Fidiana, “Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance, Leverage, dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Opini Going Concern”, Vol. 9, no.10, pp 1-16, 2020.

I. P. Hati and I. Rosini, “Pengaruh Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya dan Kondisi Keuangan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 2, no.2, pp 123-133, Oktober 2017, doi: 10.5281/zenodo. 1306138.

IAPI, “Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik”, Jakarta: Salemba, pp 5-7.

A. Juanda and T. F. Lamur, “Kualitas Audit, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp 270-287, 2021, doi: 10.22219/jaa.v4i2.

Kimberli and B. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Rasio Profitabilitas, Rasio Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 13, no.2, pp 283-299, 2021, doi: 10.28932/jam.v13i2.3901.

R. Naziah and M. H. Nyale, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern”, Vol. 5, no.7, pp 2687-2699, Juli 2022, doi: 10.54371/jiip.v5i7.747.

N. N. Nurdin, I. Pratomo, and D. Triyanto, “Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Likuiditas Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Modifikasi Going Concern”, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp 3266-3273, December 2016.

L. Pratiwi and T. H. Lim, “Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Audit Tenure, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp 67-77, Agustus 2018, doi: 10.25134/jrka.v4i2.1700.

F. Purnamasari, R. Oktavia, and C. P. Tubarad, “Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Opini Going Concern”, Vol. 25, no.2, pp 146-156, Juli 2020, doi: 10.23960/jak.v25i2.131.

D. A. Putra, A. S. Anwar, and T. Nur, “Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Komisaris Independen, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Audit Lag Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp 857-864, doi: 10.22219/jrak.v6i1.5081.

E. C. Putri and N. H. Primasari, “Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Komisaris Independen, Kepemilikan Institusional dan Audit Lag Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp 20-39, April 2017, doi: 10.36080/jak.v6i1.349.

A. W. Rachma and A. Nurbaiti, “Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan dan Disclosure Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 8, no. 5, pp 5227-5234, Oktober 2021.

K. W. Sari and E. Ruhiyat, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp 853-874, Januari 2016, doi: 10.32493/jiaup.v4i1.142.

R. P. Sari and R Wiryanti, “Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan, dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern, Vol 1, no. 1, pp 741-754, November 2021.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan H&D, Bandung: ALFABETA, pp 60-85.

I. Wahyudi, H. E. Lestari, and Mahroji, “Pengaruh Financial Distress, Opinion Shopping, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp 200-215, Maret 2022, doi: 10.32493/frkm.v5i2.18392.

A. Wardani and M. Satyawan, “Pengaruh Komisaris Independen dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp 107-115, Januari 2022, doi: 10.26740/akunesa.v10n2.p107-115.

A. Yohana, “Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern”, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp 108-118, Desember 2021, doi: 10.46821/ekobis.v2i2.237.

Published

2023-03-17

How to Cite

Salsabila Katarin Puspamarta, & Siti Mundiroh. (2023). PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, PERTUMBUHAN PERUSAHAAN, DAN OPINI AUDIT TAHUN SEBELUMNYA TERHADAP PENERIMAAN OPINI GOING CONCERN. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 3(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.55606/jaemb.v3i1.1030

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.