Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Upah Minimum Dan Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Di Kota Salatiga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jimek.v3i1.1345Keywords:
Economic growth; Minimum wage; Level of education; EmploymentAbstract
Quantitative research is a research method based on the philosophy of positivism, used for research with a certain population or sample, data collection uses research instruments, data analysis is statistical, with the aim of testing the hypotheses that have been set. The population is the area of generalization which consists of: objects/subjects that have qualities and characteristics that are applied by researchers to be studied and conclusions drawn. The population in this study are reports and publications of Economic Growth/PDRB data, Minimum Wage, Education Level and Labor Absorption in Regencies/Cities published by the Central Bureau of Statistics for the City of Salatiga. The method used in sampling in this study was purposive sampling, namely a sampling technique with certain considerations. The determination used purposive sampling because the researcher determined several criteria used, namely available and published data for Regency/City data in the last three years obtained and summarized from the Central Bureau of Statistics for the City of Salatiga.
Based on the results of data analysis and discussion obtained from the study entitled "the effect of economic growth, minimum wages and education level on employment in the city of Salatiga. Based on the results of a partial analysis, the variable economic growth has no significant effect on employment in the city of Salatiga. This means that the increase in economic growth has not been effective and has stimulated employment. Based on the results of the F test (simultaneous) in research using multiple linear regression tests, it can be concluded that simultaneously or together the variables of economic growth, minimum wage and level of education have a significant effect on the variable of employment
References
L. Siswa, “Panduan penggunaan,” no. 39, pp. 1–10, 2010.
M. Thoriq Maulana, M. Hilmi Habibullah, Sunandar, N. Sholihah, M. Ainul Rifqi L. P., and F. Fahrudin, “Laporan Akhir Laporan Akhir,” Lap. Akhir, vol. 1, no. 201310200311137, pp. 78–79, 2015.
S. Sukirno, Makro Ekonomi Teori. Pengantar Edisi Ketiga. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2011.
S. Kuznets, Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review. Volume XLV., 1955.
G. M. Grossman and A. B. Krueger, “Economic growth and the environment,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 353–377, 1995, doi: 10.2307/2118443.
Afzalur Rahman, Doktrin Ekonomi Islam. Jilid II (Yogyakarta: PT Dana Bhakti Wakaf, 1995), 361.
et. al. Indra Riko Rosandi., “‘Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 78 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengupahan (Studi Kasus Penerapan Upah Minimum Di Kota Samarinda),’” eJournal Ilmu Pemerintah. Vol. 5, 3 (2017), 1119-1130.
L. Oktapiana, “Pengaruh Kompensasi, Tingkat Pendidikan, dan Pelatihan Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Industri Annie Garment Nganjuk,” Simki-Economic, vol. Vol. 2 No., no. 03, p. 4, 2017.
A. Azra, Esai-esai Intelektual Muslim dan Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: PT Logos wacana Ilmu, 1999.
“https://googleweblight.com/2010/04/05/pengaruh-tingkat-pendidikan-terhadap-produktifitas, diakses pada Mei 14 2017.).”
S. C. Todaro, M.P. dan Smith, Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jilid I Edisi Kesembilan. Haris Munandar (penerjemah). Erlangga, Jakarta, 2006.
Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia. Penerbit: Ghalia Indonesia Arfida and 2007. Artikel, Dalam Konteks Profesional Keperwatan. http://inna.PPNI.or.id/html.19Juli2008.
R. dan R. B. L. Juwita, “Kontribusi Tingkat Pendidikan terhadap Pendapatan Sektoral di Kota Palembang.,” Forum Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan J. Ilm. STIE MDP vol. 2., 2013.
N. Zariah, Metode Penelitian Sosial Dan Pendidikan. (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007), h. 191).
I. Hasan, Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik. (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008).
J. Subagyo, Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, ), h. 63.
