Umpan balik dan Evaluasi Terhadap kinerja Organisasi:  A Literature Review

Mahyadi Mahyadi; Mochammad Isa Anshori

doi:10.55606/jimek.v3i2.1781

Authors

Mahyadi Mahyadi Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Mochammad Isa Anshori Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jimek.v3i2.1781

Keywords:

Feedback, Evaluation, Performance

Abstract

Feedback is information provided to individuals about their performance and can help them understand the difference between desired performance and actual performance achieved. Individuals with high self-evaluation tend to assess job demands in a more positive manner and have a greater ability to face or overcome those demands. High self-evaluation can influence individuals' perceptions of work situations and have a positive impact on job satisfaction. This systematic review is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases used were Scopus, SAGE full-text articles, and the language of publication was English. The keywords used in the article search were "Self-Evaluation" and "Feedback". After identifying several articles, the authors analyzed and synthesized them according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria set for this study. The findings indicate that manager performance evaluations using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) pay more attention to general actions than to unique actions, unless cognitive feedback is given to highlight the importance of using all actions. This underscores the importance of considering behavior as the ultimate outcome of the feedback provided. This research also aims to create a better work environment through the acceptance of constructive feedback and the appropriate use of feedback. High-quality feedback is an important factor in the context of learning and individual performance in the workplace. Overall, these studies provide a better understanding of the importance of feedback in the context of learning, performance, and individual development in the workplace. Dialogic feedback, self-evaluation, and consistent feedback systems can help create a better work environment and improve individual performance and job satisfaction.

References

Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018a). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128

Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018b). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128

Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core Self-Evaluations: A Review of the Trait and its Role in Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. In European Journal of Personality (Vol. 17, Issue SPEC. 1). https://doi.org/10.1002/per.481

Cane, D. B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1985). Depression and the Effects of.Positive and Negative Feedback on Expectations, Evaluations, and Performance 1. In Cognitive Therapy and Research (Vol. 9, Issue 2).

Cynthia M. Pavett. (1983). Evaluation of the Impact of feedback on Performance and Motivation. Human Relation, 36(7), 641–654.

Erez, A., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1270–1279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1270

Hsieh, H. H., & Huang, J. T. (2017). Core Self-Evaluations and Job and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating and Moderated Mediating Role of Job Insecurity. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1270888

Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of Individual Feedback on Behavior in Organizations. In Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 64, Issue 4).

Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Genetic influences on core self-evaluations, job satisfaction, and work stress: A behavioral genetics mediated model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.005

Kang, G. (Grace), & Fredin, A. (2012). The balanced scorecard: The effects of feedback on performance evaluation. Management Research Review, 35(7), 637–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211238848

Karatepe, O. M., Haktanir, M., & Yorganci, I. (2010). The impacts of core self-evaluations on customer-related social stressors and emotional exhaustion. Service Industries Journal, 30(9), 1565–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802626766

Kluger, A. N., & Denisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory We argue that a considerable body of evidence suggesting that feedback intervention (FI) effects on performance are quite vari. In Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 9, Issue 2).

London, M., & Smither, J. W. (n.d.). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. www.HRmanagementreview.com

Mulder, R. H., & Ellinger, A. D. (2013). Perceptions of quality of feedback in organizations: Characteristics, determinants, outcomes of feedback, and possibilities for improvement: introduction to a special issue. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311293266

Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259

Northcraft, G. B., & Ashford, S. J. (1990). The Preservation of Self in Everyday Life: The Effects of Performance Expectations and Feedback Context on Feedback Inquiry.

Peng, J. I. A. X. I., Li, D., Zhang, Z., Tian, Y. U., Miao, D., Xiao, W. E. I., & Zhang, J. (2016). How can core self-evaluations influence job burnout? the key roles of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314521478

Piccoli, G., Rodriguez, J., Palese, B., & Bartosiak, M. L. (2020). Feedback at scale: designing for accurate and timely practical digital skills evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2019.1701955

Raveh, E., Friedman, J., & Portnoy, S. (2018). Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm. Clinical Rehabilitation, 32(10), 1308–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518774104

Srivastava, R., & Rangarajan, D. (2008). Understanding the salespeople’s “feedback-satisfaction” linkage: What role does job perceptions play? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620810858418

Stephen J. Brandley. (n.d.). What’s Working? Briefing and evaluating workplace performance improvement.

Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. (2012). Linking Feedback Quality and Goal Orientation to Feedback Seeking and Job Performance. Human Performance, 25(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.658927

Zhang, J., Wu, Q., Miao, D., Yan, X., & Peng, J. (2014). The Impact of Core Self-evaluations on Job Satisfaction: The Mediator Role of Career Commitment. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0328-5