Parameter Linguistik Forensik dan Konsep Aplikasi untuk Identifikasi Ancaman, Pemerasan, dan Penipuan Daring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v5i1.6382Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Cybercrime, Forensic Linguistics, Natural Language Processing, Online CrimeAbstract
Digital communication has expanded cybercrime that relies on language to threaten, extort, and deceive victims. Research in Indonesia has not yet produced validated criminal linguistic parameters that can support an automated language analysis application. This study develops forensic linguistic parameters for identifying online threats, extortion, and fraud and designs a conceptual application based on artificial intelligence and natural language processing. A qualitative descriptive design was applied to 200 digital documents comprising 40 final court decisions, 30 official cybercrime reports, 50 officially published fraudulent messages, and 80 simulated messages derived from authentic case characteristics. Data were analyzed through text preprocessing, pragmatic, semantic, speech act, and discourse analysis, followed by open, axial, and selective coding with NVivo 14. The study identified twelve parameters: urgency, persuasive strategies, imperative sentences, promises of financial gain, emotional manipulation, institutional impersonation, implicit threats, identity fraud, explicit threats, false authority, exploitation of social relationships, and economic pressure. These parameters informed a conceptual system containing preprocessing, parameter extraction, risk classification, and reporting modules. Source triangulation reached 91.7%, theoretical triangulation 92.8%, and expert judgment 91.1%. The findings provide a validated foundation for AI-assisted early detection, cybercrime investigation, and digital security literacy in Indonesia.
References
Al-Subaiey, A., Al-Thani, M., Alam, N. A., Antora, K. F., Khandakar, A., & Zaman, S. M. A. U. (2024). Novel interpretable and robust web-based AI platform for phishing email detection. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 120, 109625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109625
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Basit, A., Zafar, M., Liu, X., Javed, A. R., Jalil, Z., & Kifayat, K. (2021). A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques. Telecommunication Systems, 76(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00733-2
Boulieris, P., Pavlopoulos, J., Xenos, A., & Vassalos, V. (2024). Fraud detection with natural language processing. Machine Learning, 113, 5087–5108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06354-5
Butavicius, M., Taib, R., & Han, S. J. (2022). Why people keep falling for phishing scams: The effects of time pressure and deception cues on the detection of phishing emails. Computers & Security, 123, 102937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102937
Butt, U. A., Amin, R., Aldabbas, H., Mohan, S., Alouffi, B., & Ahmadian, A. (2023). Cloud-based email phishing attack using machine and deep learning algorithm. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9, 3043–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00760-3
Carroll, F., Adejobi, J. A., & Montasari, R. (2022). How good are we at detecting a phishing attack? Investigating the evolving phishing attack email and why it continues to successfully deceive society. SN Computer Science, 3, 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01069-1
Dewis, M., & Viana, T. (2022). Phish Responder: A hybrid machine learning approach to detect phishing and spam emails. Applied System Innovation, 5(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5040073
Direktorat Tindak Pidana Siber Bareskrim Polri. (2025). Laporan akhir tahun penanganan tindak pidana siber tahun 2025. Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., Arya, V., Attar, R. W., Bansal, S., Alhomoud, A., & Chui, K. T. (2024). Advanced BERT and CNN-based computational model for phishing detection in enterprise systems. CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 141(3), 2165–2183. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.056473
Hakim, Z. M., Ebner, N. C., Oliveira, D. S., Getz, S. J., Levin, B. E., Lin, T., Lloyd, K., Lai, V. T., Grilli, M. D., & Wilson, R. C. (2021). The Phishing Email Suspicion Test (PEST): A lab-based task for evaluating the cognitive mechanisms of phishing detection. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1342–1352. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01495-0
Jáñez-Martino, F., Alaiz-Rodríguez, R., González-Castro, V., Fidalgo, E., & Alegre, E. (2023). A review of spam email detection: Analysis of spammer strategies and the dataset shift problem. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 1145–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10195-4
Kavya, S., & Sumathi, D. (2025). Staying ahead of phishers: A review of recent advances and emerging methodologies in phishing detection. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11055-z
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan tahunan keamanan siber Indonesia 2024. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia.
Naqvi, B., Perova, K., Farooq, A., Makhdoom, I., Oyedeji, S., & Porras, J. (2023). Mitigation strategies against phishing attacks: A systematic literature review. Computers & Security, 132, 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103387
Olsson, J. (2021). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Pradesi, D., & Marlianingsih, N. (2025). Linguistic features of online scam messages: A forensic analysis of deceptive communication language. JEdu: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.30998/jedu.v5i2.14352
Rosyidah, R. H. (2025). Semantic urgency and illusion of authority in phishing emails: A corpus-based analysis. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 5(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v5i1.908
Salloum, S., Gaber, T., Vadera, S., & Shaalan, K. (2022). A systematic literature review on phishing email detection using natural language processing techniques. IEEE Access, 10, 65703–65727. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3183083
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Sturman, D., Bell, E. A., Auton, J. C., Breakey, G. R., & Wiggins, M. W. (2024). The roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in phishing email detection. Applied Ergonomics, 119, 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104309
Sturman, D., Valenzuela, C., Plate, O., Tanvir, T., Auton, J. C., Bayl-Smith, P., & Wiggins, M. W. (2023). The role of cue utilization in the detection of phishing emails. Applied Ergonomics, 106, 103887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103887
Tang, L., & Mahmoud, Q. H. (2021). A survey of machine learning-based solutions for phishing website detection. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 3(3), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.3390/make3030034
Tis’ah, J. A. R. H. (2024). Kejahatan berbahasa dan kejahatan dunia maya (Language crime and cyber crime). Penerbit NEM.
Tis’ah, J. A. R. H. (2025). Pengantar linguistik forensik. Pustaka Buku Nusantara.
Vacalares, S. T., Sta. Ana, B. P. E., & Dranto, D. Q. (2024). Bank emails: The language of legit and scam. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(7), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240721
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
