Evaluasi Program Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (KIA) pada Ibu Hamil di Puskesmas Peot, Kelurahan Satar Peot, Kecamatan Borong, Kabupaten Manggarai Timur

Waldetrudis Noni; William Djani; Made Ngurah Demi Andayana; Ernestus Holivil

doi:10.55606/sscj-amik.v4i4.6195

Authors

Waldetrudis Noni Universitas Nusa Cendana
William Djani Universitas Nusa Cendana
Made Ngurah Demi Andayana Universitas Nusa Cendana
Ernestus Holivil Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/sscj-amik.v4i4.6195

Keywords:

Borong District, Community Health Center, East Manggarai Regency, Healthcare Services, Program Evaluation

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Program for pregnant women at Peot Community Health Center, Borong District, East Manggarai Regency. The study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design and utilized the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. Informants consisted of the Head of the Health Center, MCH Program Coordinator, healthcare workers, and pregnant women selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings indicate that, in the context dimension, the MCH Program is highly relevant to community needs and addresses maternal health issues such as anemia, chronic energy deficiency, and high-risk pregnancies. In terms of input, the program is supported by adequate human resources, healthcare facilities, and an innovative funding scheme known as the Seuntais Movement. Regarding the process dimension, the program has been implemented in accordance with healthcare service standards through several innovations, including the Pregnant Women Companion Midwife Program, partnerships between midwives and traditional birth attendants, the Lonto Leok community forum, and the Stunting and Maternal Mortality Alert System. In the product dimension, antenatal care coverage reached 100% during 2022–2024 and contributed to maintaining zero maternal mortality in recent years. However, child health examination coverage remains between 82% and 86%, indicating the need for further improvement.

References

Agustino, L. (2008). Dasar-dasar kebijakan publik. Alfabeta.

Arikunto, S. (2004). Evaluasi program pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. (2024). Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur dalam angka 2024. BPS Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Budi, W. (2002). Kebijakan publik: Teori dan proses. Media Pressindo.

Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Manggarai Timur. (2023). Profil kesehatan Kabupaten Manggarai Timur tahun 2023. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Manggarai Timur.

Dongoran, N., & Siregar, P. A. (2023). Program pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak di masyarakat pesisir. JK: Jurnal Kesehatan, 1(1), 107–117.

Ermalena, M. H. S. (2017). Indikator kesehatan SDGs di Indonesia. Makalah disampaikan pada Diskusi Panel Pengendalian Tembakau dan Tujuan Pembangunan Indonesia.

Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Standar Teknis Pemenuhan Mutu Pelayanan Dasar pada Standar Pelayanan Minimal Bidang Kesehatan. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurcahya, E., Muftiadi, A., & Buchari, A. (2020). Evaluasi input dan proses program badan usaha milik desa. Responsive, 2(3), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v2i3.26084

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Sardjo, S., Darmajanti, L., & Boediono, K. C. (2017). Implementasi model evaluasi formatif program pembangunan sosial (EFPPS): Partisipasi multipihak dalam evaluasi program. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. The Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wirawan. (2011). Evaluasi: Teori, model, standar, aplikasi, dan profesi. Rajawali Pers.