Analisis Kesesuaian dan Distribusi Level Kognitif pada Butir Soal Objektif Penilaian Sumatif Akhir Semester Bahasa Indonesia Kelas X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v5i2.6257Keywords:
Cognitive Levels, Indonesian Language, Merdeka Curriculum, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Summative AssessmentAbstract
The requirements of the Merdeka Curriculum mandate that assessments have cognitive level alignment and distribution that are consistent with Learning Outcomes (CP) and Learning Objectives (TP). This study aims to analyze the distribution of cognitive levels and their alignment with reconstruction indicators in the objective items of the End-of-Semester Summative Assessment (PSAS) for 10th-grade Indonesian Language. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach using content analysis. The data consisted of 45 PSAS items for 10th-grade Indonesian Language, developed by the Cilacap Regency Indonesian Language Teachers’ Working Group (MGMP), and collected through documentation. The analysis was conducted by classifying the test items based on the cognitive levels of the Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised by Anderson and Krathwohl and examining their alignment with the reconstruction indicators. The validity of the data was strengthened through expert judgment by two high school Indonesian language teachers. The results of the study indicate that all test items align with the established reconstruction indicators. However, the distribution of cognitive levels did not yet show a balanced proportion. The questions were dominated by the comprehension level (C2) at 42.2%, followed by recall (C1) at 28.9% and application (C3) at 22.2%. The analysis level (C4) reached only 6.7%, while the evaluation (C5) and creation (C6) levels were not found. These findings highlight the need to develop more balanced assessments to support the attainment of higher-order thinking skills in line with the requirements of the Merdeka Curriculum.
References
Abbas, W., & Sutrisno, S. (2022). Pengembangan website desa sebagai sistem informasi dan inovasi di Desa Indu Makkombong, Kabupaten Polewali Mandar. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.54082/jamsi.276
Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV Syakir Media Press. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/juwxn
Afrita, N., Safelia, N., & Erwati, M. (2023). The influence of accountability, transparency and community participation on management of village funds. International Conference Economics and Business, 1(1).
Andayani, W., Dahlia, Putrianti, E., Wisdaningrum, O., Putranto, P., & Yanuarisa, Y. (2024). Penguatan good governance: Pengalaman penerapan electronic government pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Aktiva: Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 6(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.52005/aktiva.v6i2.240
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A bridged edition. Pearson Education.
Atmadja, I. W., & Saputra, K. A. K. (2020). Determinants of village financial management accountability. Journal of Accounting and Investment. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.210215
Benjami, B., Qohar, A., & Sulandra, I. M. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA kelas X dalam memecahkan masalah SPLTV. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.574
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7624
Cahyani, A. D., & Sukoyo, J. (2025). Analisis kualitas soal asesmen sumatif akhir semester Bahasa Jawa kelas VII di SMPN 2 Kutowinangun. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 8(2), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.29407/jsp.v8i2.1148
Cressa, J., & Adni, D. F. (2023). Level kognitif taksonomi Bloom pada soal mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. J-LELC: Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.25299/j-lelc.2023.12094
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Doyle, L. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927200
Halim, A. (2024). Efektivitas asesmen sumatif dalam pengukuran capaian pembelajaran peserta didik kelas IV MIN 19 Bireuen. Journal of Comprehensive Science, 3(6), 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v3i6.776
Hanan, M. J., Irawan, M. P. T., & Naryatmojo, D. L. (2025). Evaluasi kesesuaian penilaian sumatif akhir jenjang kelas XII dengan distribusi ranah kognitif dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Bastra, 10(3), 912–922.
Izzah, A. N., Azizah, S. S. L., Ekawati, R., & Rufiana, I. S. (2025). Eksplorasi analisis butir soal Bahasa Indonesia di kelas II sekolah dasar berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia, 5(2), 1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i2.1064
Juhanda, A. (2016). Analisis soal jenjang kognitif Taksonomi Bloom revisi pada buku sekolah elektronik (BSE) biologi SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 21(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i1.36258
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Martatiyana, D. R., Derlis, A., Aviarizki, H. W., Jurdil, R. R., Andayani, T., & Hidayat, O. S. (2023). Analisis komparasi implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan Kurikulum 2013. Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 96–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v9i1.11600
Muldawati, M., & Hilaliyah, T. (2024). Asesmen sumatif buatan guru melalui soal uji coba pada materi Bahasa Indonesia kelas V sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basataka, 7(2), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v7i2.508
Nabilah, A. A., Wachidah, L. R., & Susanti, A. I. (2025). Analisis tes objektif dan uraian pada buku teks Bahasa Indonesia kelas VIII menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 8(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107229
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2006). Educational assessment of students. Prentice-Hall.
Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk pemulihan krisis pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v19i2.45301
Parmini, N. P., Putra, I. B. R., Aridawati, I. A. P., & Sudiartha, I. W. (2023). 21st century skills and information literacy in Indonesian language and literature education study program. Mimbar Ilmu, 28(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v28i1.59441
Permatasari, L., & Yahya, M. (2024). Analisis level kognitif pada instrumen soal asesmen sumatif Bahasa Indonesia jenjang Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Salaka, 6(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.33751/jsalaka.v6i1.9825
Pinasti, R., & Ernawati, E. (2026). Tingkatan kognitif soal buku Cerdas Cergas Bahasa Indonesia kelas X berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(2), 2154–2161. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3683
Rahmah, A. A., & Nasryah, C. E. (2019). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Rahmawati, N. S., & Rahman, M. F. (2025). Analisis butir soal objektif penilaian sumatif akhir semester gasal mata pelajaran ekonomi. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(8), 8863–8873. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i8.8837
Rosyidah, L. U., Nurdin, R. A. S. P. S., Naryatmojo, D. L., & Wagiran, W. (2025). Rekonstruksi asesmen sumatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 15(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbsi.v15i1.94293
Sari, V. N. I., Utomo, A. P. Y., & Sumarwati, S. (2022). Kualitas soal Bahasa Indonesia di SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Pontianak: Analisis butir soal. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 112–119.
Septa, S., Agus, S., Susanto, E., & Pratiwi, D. S. (2024). Analisis kualitas dan tingkat kognitif soal penilaian sumatif akhir semester genap kelas IX SMP Negeri 02 Kota Bengkulu berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi. Indonesian Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.56855/intel.v3i2.1047
Surtantini, R. (2019). Reading comprehension question levels in grade X English students’ book in light of the issues of curriculum policy in Indonesia. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 9(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v9i1.44-52
Wahyuningtyas, D., & Katminingsih, Y. (2022). Analisis tingkat kognitif kompetensi dasar Kurikulum 2013 mata pelajaran matematika wajib kelas X SMA/MA berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi Anderson. Jurnal Cendekia, 6(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
